Skip to main content

Hells Bells! Shell Sells Wells!

So why does an oil industry major sell working gas wells?

Shell Plans to Sell Stake in Eagle Ford Shale - WSJ

The explanation tossed out is that Shell and other majors came late into the game, overpaying for assets.

Okay. This would explain a decision to sell acreage. But selling working wells indicates that the money flowing from these wells is not good enough to make owing them worthwhile for Shell. (Indeed, the original WSJ report reported "the assets weren’t meeting the company’s profit targets") Can the smaller buyer (with less overhead, perhaps) can deal with a lower margin? We'll see.

A month ago, after reports of write downs of shale assets by many companies, it was suggested that

The companies are turning instead to developing current projects, unable to justify buying more property while fields bought during the 2009-2012 flurry remain below their purchase price, according to analysts.

As Fadel Gheit, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. was quoted in the above link:

“People do not sell unless they really need the money to invest in better options,”

And one of those options seems to be a gas-to-liquids plant. So Shell is betting on cheap gas, as long as someone else is producing it.

But for a sunnier outlook, there is always Forbes:

According to a report released by the Wood Mackenzie firm in early January, Eagle Ford is now the largest oil and gas development on the face of the earth based on total capital expenditures. In the coming years, Wood-Mac believes total investment in the play will surpass even the $116 billion projected to be invested in the Kashagan project in Kazakhstan.

Of course, it is certainly not the largest in terms of production. Not even in Texas.

Comments

Colm Barry said…
"... why does an oil industry major sell working gas wells?" - Yes, why would they? Because they see that this shale boom is doomed and the oil and gas industry suffers from a law of diminishing returns. And they, as anyone who has competitive intelligence to protect, will publicly give no "honest" reason but one that maximizes profits (or minimizes losses). Such reacts a prudent investor ...
Gerald B said…
Funny. You guys need to take a course like https://www.petroskills.com/course/exploration-and-production-process-basics-understanding-the-petroleum-industry-value-cycle-epb

Majors selling their interests in operational wells is pretty darned common. The front office simply wants free cash flow for other purposes. That and the time cost of money of yesterday's investment versus the cash/credit cost differential for next year's project(s). IF rates go up (and how couldn't they?!) then this is a pretty bright margin call.
Anonymous said…
I share the Fadel Gheit's opinion and so I suggest these majors a better option, that is KiteGen technology.
For more information you can consult the follow link: http://www.kitegen.com/en/2016/03/30/spain-2015-lets-replace-turbines-with-kitegen/

Popular posts from this blog

The elemental insanity of carbon sequestration

The periodic table of the elements, devised by Mendeleev in 1870, is one of the most dangerous things ever created. It seemingly awakens us to a world of chemical possibilities, but it misleads us into believing that the world actually provides us with these things as starting materials. The most obvious problem, of course, is that is gives equal visual weight to atoms with vastly different relative abundances. Thus, we could try scaling by that. But that seems hard to get right as well.

But my current beef is that, except for a few inert and/or shiny things, nothing is available in elemental form. Which leads into an analysis of this fake news: Scientists find way to make mineral which can remove CO2 from atmosphere ******snip***
Scientists have found a rapid way of producing magnesite, a mineral which stores carbon dioxide. If this can be developed to an industrial scale, it opens the door to removing CO2 from the atmosphere for long-term storage, thus countering the global warming …

Who Killed The Electric Gas Tank?

A few months from now, or perhaps 5-10 years from now, we will know whether or not EEStor can make good on its promise to sell a electrical storage device capable of propelling a reasonably-sized automobile down a freeway for a couple hundred miles before needing a recharge. There are some indications that they are making progress and that this could happen, but there are many reasons to remain skeptical. In this post, I will wade into these waters -- and then get out quickly. Will EEStor revolutionize motor transportation and more? Will it even work?

The human quest for energy is an interesting topic. Mostly by burning things, we have transformed our relationship with the planet and each other. It has been said that we are addicted to oil, but it is more the case that we are addicted to what harnessed energy can do. As it is learned that some utilization of energy is not sustainable for environmental reasons, or for lack of supply, the natural response is to search for other ways of d…